Post by commiczar on Aug 3, 2009 3:49:23 GMT 10
Greetings to All !!
NOTE:
This topic is not presented with any "yea" or "nay" from my own
personal perspective; as I usually accept and respect almost any
MicroGovt...as long as it is positive, and reflects a purpose.
( i.e. "I do not have a horse in this race".....merely a "rider" )
What are your thoughts regarding the so-called "Camo Micros"
( i.e. "Camouflaged Micronations" ); those micronations which hide
behind a wall of secrecy, such as: double-identities, no public
access of their email address, or a physical address for making
contact with, no photographic evidence of their existence, etc ?
Of course, one could / should / would assume that it would depend
somewhat on one's degree of how "serious" he or she is with regards
to micronationalism; which then, prompts the additional question
...as to how best to define and apply the word "serious" as well.
One can be "serious" within one's own personal definition of micronationalism
being nothing more than a "hobby"; then again, on the other-hand,
another person can be just as "serious" within his or her own personal
definition and application of micronationalism being a chosen "life-style".
As there is no definitive definition on any of the associated words
of "micronationalism"...with regards and respect to how we active
micronationalists all reserve our rights to engage and apply...
then I suppose that this topic is more-or-less moot.
However.....
Many micronationalist might still believe that...if one is to be taken "serious",
at *any* level within the Greater MicroSphere, then one must
express and explain at least some of his or her physical and/or
virtual infrastructures associated with their micronation.
Once again....I take my hat off to almost any micronationalist and
micronation, as long as each have positive policies; and to be in
complete opposition to my views on any given issue, or any other
micronationalist for that matter, is to be considered as a 'positive"
position.....as such opposition demonstrates a position of policy
.......which is...in-and-of-itself.......a reflection of a progressive MicroGovt.
( i.e...."stand on your own two feet" attitude / aptitude )
Regards to All !!
_____________
NOTE:
This topic is not presented with any "yea" or "nay" from my own
personal perspective; as I usually accept and respect almost any
MicroGovt...as long as it is positive, and reflects a purpose.
( i.e. "I do not have a horse in this race".....merely a "rider" )
What are your thoughts regarding the so-called "Camo Micros"
( i.e. "Camouflaged Micronations" ); those micronations which hide
behind a wall of secrecy, such as: double-identities, no public
access of their email address, or a physical address for making
contact with, no photographic evidence of their existence, etc ?
Of course, one could / should / would assume that it would depend
somewhat on one's degree of how "serious" he or she is with regards
to micronationalism; which then, prompts the additional question
...as to how best to define and apply the word "serious" as well.
One can be "serious" within one's own personal definition of micronationalism
being nothing more than a "hobby"; then again, on the other-hand,
another person can be just as "serious" within his or her own personal
definition and application of micronationalism being a chosen "life-style".
As there is no definitive definition on any of the associated words
of "micronationalism"...with regards and respect to how we active
micronationalists all reserve our rights to engage and apply...
then I suppose that this topic is more-or-less moot.
However.....
Many micronationalist might still believe that...if one is to be taken "serious",
at *any* level within the Greater MicroSphere, then one must
express and explain at least some of his or her physical and/or
virtual infrastructures associated with their micronation.
Once again....I take my hat off to almost any micronationalist and
micronation, as long as each have positive policies; and to be in
complete opposition to my views on any given issue, or any other
micronationalist for that matter, is to be considered as a 'positive"
position.....as such opposition demonstrates a position of policy
.......which is...in-and-of-itself.......a reflection of a progressive MicroGovt.
( i.e...."stand on your own two feet" attitude / aptitude )
Regards to All !!
_____________